Petition argues the 70 home development infringes on green space and playground
A petition to ‘Save Histon Road Playground’ has sparked significant public opposition, as campaigners argue that the Cambridge Investment Partnership (CIP) development at Histon Road will encroach upon protected green space. The development, a partnership between the city council and housebuilder Hill, seeks to build 70 homes—predominantly high-end two-storey houses—without allocating its own green space.
Opposition to the plans centre around that rather than incorporating dedicated green areas within the project, the developers plan to use the publicly owned Histon Road Recreation Ground as an amenity for its residents. This includes the construction of two new access points directly into and through the enclosed playground, a move that petitioners claim is an unfair appropriation of public land.
Local Concerns and Safety Issues
Campaigners argue that allowing private developments to rely on public parks sets a dangerous precedent. One of the core concerns raised is the risk to children’s safety. Currently, parents can allow their children to play freely within the enclosed space of the Rec, without fear of them straying into traffic. However, if access points to the new development roads are created, there are fears that this safety will be compromised.
A spokesperson for the petition stated: “This development is maximising its own profits at the expense of the community by failing to provide its own green space. Instead, it is using public land as a selling point for its homes. Histon Road Rec is a protected green space, and it should not be repurposed to benefit private developers.”
Council’s Response and Planned Improvements
The council has defended the development, with Cllr Gerri Bird, Executive Councillor for Housing, asserting that: “Change can be challenging, but in this instance, it will be beneficial for everyone. The Rec will see improvements in biodiversity, accessibility, and play facilities, funded by financial contributions from the developer.”
While the council has acknowledged local concerns, they maintain that the planned enhancements, including better accessibility and ongoing maintenance, will ultimately benefit both existing and new residents. Following community feedback, the number of planned access points was reduced from two to one, and the play area will remain enclosed.
Biodiversity and the Future of the Rec
Despite assurances that the development will lead to ‘Biodiversity Net Gain’ through additional planting and habitat enhancements, local residents remain skeptical. Critics argue that private developments should not depend on public recreational areas to meet planning requirements, particularly in a city where green space is already under pressure.
As the debate continues, the petition reflects growing frustration over the perceived privatisation of public amenities, raising wider questions about sustainable urban development and the responsibility of private developers to provide essential community infrastructure.
